Investment research
Quorum
An AI investment committee: four agents debate a stock or ETF and return a paper-trade thesis with a quant score.
- Price
- $999
- Structure
- Four agents — bull, bear, quant, risk
- Output
- A paper-trade thesis with a conviction score
- Scope
- Research only. Paper trades, not execution
What it does
A single AI asked about a stock produces a plausible, balanced, useless paragraph. Quorum instead runs four agents with genuinely opposed mandates — one building the bull case, one the bear case, one running the quantitative screen, one sizing the risk — and makes them argue.
What comes out is a thesis with the disagreement left in: where the bull and bear actually diverge, what the numbers say about both, and a conviction score that reflects how much the committee agreed rather than how confident one model sounded.
Why the adversarial structure matters
This is the same principle behind CrossCheck AI, applied to analysis rather than extraction. A model asked to evaluate something will tend toward the agreeable middle. Models given opposing briefs surface the things that actually matter, because each is looking for what the other missed.
Worth saying: Quorum produces research and paper trades. It is not investment advice and it does not execute anything.
Questions people actually ask
Before you call
Does it place trades?
No. It produces a thesis and paper trades. Execution is deliberately out of scope.
Is this investment advice?
No. It is a research tool that structures an argument. Decisions, and responsibility for them, stay with you.
Talk to us about Quorum
A short call, and a straight answer about whether this fits your business.
